Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/6/2007

State v. Moore

Citations

225 S.W.3d 556
2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 696
2007 WL 1610453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that the trial court has jurisdiction until the record is filed in the appellate court
finding if the State objects to an untimely amended motion for new trial, the trial court and appellate court should consider only the original motion and any timely amendment
rule 21.4(b) permits State to insist the trial court rule only upon timely motion or timely amended motion for new trial
if State objects to untimely amended motion for new trial, trial court and appellate court should consider only original motion and any timely amendment and should not consider any matters raised for first time in untimely amendment
trial court has jurisdiction until record is filed in appellate court
trial court was entitled to rely on new issues not contained in the defendant’s motion for new trial, where the State failed to object to defendant’s late-filed amendment within the seventy-five-day period before the trial court’s order granting a new trial became final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Heryey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.