Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 8/3/2007
State v. Moore
Citations
- 240 S.W.3d 324
- 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 6153
- 2007 WL 2214545
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The duty to disclose under Brady arose only if the prosecutors or other members of the ‘prosecuting team’ knew of the investigation or had access to the information”
- new trial must be granted where material evidence favorable to the accused has been discovered since trial
- new trial must be granted where material evidence favorable to the accused has been discovered since trial
- new trial must be granted where material evidence favorable to the accused has been discovered since trial
- “The duty to disclose under Brady arose only if the prosecutors or other members of the ‘prosecuting team’ knew of the investigation or had access to the information”
- “The duty to disclose under Brady arose only if the prosecutors or other members of the ‘prosecuting team’ knew of the investigation or had access to the information”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patterson, Puryear, Pemberton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-05-01· cited 52×
- State v. FergusonTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-02-04
- Billy Moore v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-16
- Laura Ashley Hall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-05-01
- Laura Ashley Hall v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-02-19
- John Edison Landor v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-09-16
- George Holmes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-07-31
- State v. Thomas L. VarkonyiTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2008-03-27
- State v. Maurice Scott FergusonTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2011-02-04
- Jerome Lydale Anderson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-12-22
- Asa Asuncion v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2019-08-21
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0478Texas Attorney General Reports· 2025-01-27
- The State of Texas v. Michael RuscoeTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2025-03-21
- The State of Texas v. Michael RuscoeTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2025-08-27
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-13· cited 942×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-14· cited 511×
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-21· cited 440×
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-02-28· cited 423×
- Ex Parte KimesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-24· cited 234×
- State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-06· cited 150×
- Ex Parte BrandleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-12-13· cited 126×
- Hafdahl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-12-19· cited 122×
- Delamora v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-02-05· cited 78×
- State v. ReadTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-03-12· cited 75×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Lawrence Smith, Cross v. James W. Fairman and Neil F. Hartigan, Cross-AppelleesSeventh Circuit· 1985-07-22· cited 66×
- Shanks v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-01-12· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.