Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/30/2013

Druery v. State

Citations

412 S.W.3d 523
2013 WL 5808182
2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that it is substance of filing, not its title, that governs its treatment by reviewing court
explaining that, although the evidence at the threshold stage supported a-finding of competency or ineompetency, because evidence of only ineompetency could be considered, weighing, competing credible evidence was error
explaining that, although the evidence at the threshold stage supported a finding of competency or incompetency, because evidence of only incompetency could be considered, weighing competing credible evidence was error
permitting review of both Article 46.05 competency motion and supplement to that motion, when only original motion was timely filed for purposes of twenty-day rule
stating informal inquiry intended to determine whether issue of competency sufficiently raised such that formal hearing should be held
permitting review of both Article 46.05 competency motion and supplement to that motion, when only original motion was timely filed for purposes of twenty-day rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Cochran, Alcala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.