Hawaii Supreme Court· 7/15/1980
State v. Moore
Citations
- 614 P.2d 931
- 62 Haw. 301
- 1980 Haw. LEXIS 177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant can cure a refusal unless a delay would materially affect the test results or prove substantially inconvenient to administer
- “We . . . decline to hold with a rule of law which would rigidly and unreasonably bind an arrested person to his first words spoken, no matter how quickly and under what circumstances those words are withdrawn.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum, Nakamura
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-08-12· cited 59×
- Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 40×
- Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-03-31· cited 39×
- State v. SuazoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 39×
- Matter of SmithIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-03-08· cited 28×
- Larmer v. STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-16· cited 28×
- State v. CorradoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-05-27· cited 26×
- Hoyle v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-01-27· cited 24×
- State v. RydeskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1997-10-02· cited 19×
- Baldwin v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1993-03-30· cited 17×
- Pickard v. State Dept. of Public SafetyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1990-12-18· cited 16×
- State v. BonvieSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-08-24· cited 14×
- Fugere v. State, Taxation & Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-06· cited 14×
- State v. PineauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-04-08· cited 12×
- Lively v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1991-01-04· cited 9×
- Leviner v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-06· cited 8×
- Lynch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-03-23· cited 7×
- State v. SuazoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-17· cited 6×
- United States v. James E. GovroNinth Circuit· 1987-11-23· cited 5×
- Department of Licensing v. LaxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-04-29· cited 4×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Robertson v. State Ex Rel. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1972-09-26· cited 67×
- Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1974-12-19· cited 67×
- Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-08-12· cited 63×
- Peterson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-12-30· cited 51×
- Molokoa Village Development Co. v. Kauai Electric Co.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1979-04-02· cited 47×
- Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev.Colorado Court of Appeals· 1977-02-03· cited 46×
- Juliette Kam Oi Lee v. King Fong WongHawaii Supreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 26×
- Keller v. La Rissa, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-11-15· cited 16×
- Currier v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-05-08· cited 15×
- Hanlon v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1963-08-19· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. SchaeferCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-06· cited 8×
- Rouse v. State, Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-01-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.