Skip to main content
· 3/16/1988

Larmer v. STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY

Citations

  • 522 So. 2d 941
  • 1988 WL 21010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retraction of initial refusal valid if given moments later, while still in continuous presence of officer, and if no inconvenience would result
  • retraction of initial refusal valid if given moments later, while still in continuous presence of officer, and if no inconvenience would result
  • retraction of initial refusal valid if given moments later, while still in continuous presence of officer, and if no inconvenience would result
  • employing three of the Lund factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.