Skip to main content
· 8/12/1968

Zidell v. Bright

Citations

  • 264 Cal. App. 2d 867
  • 71 Cal. Rptr. 111
  • 1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 2155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • once motorist has voluntarily refused a reasonable opportunity to take test, police do not need to provide test when motorist changes his mind
  • police need not arrange for belated test once defendant had \refused to submit after fair warning of the consequences\
  • police need not arrange for belated test once defendant had \refused to submit after fair warning of the consequences\
  • police need not arrange for belated test once defendant had “refused to submit after fair warning of the consequences”
  • \It would be inconsistent with the purpose of the statute to hold that [the officers] were required to turn aside from their other responsibilities and arrange for administration of a belated test . . . once appellant had refused to submit after fair warning of the consequences.\
  • \It would be inconsistent with the purpose of the statute to hold that [the officers] were required to turn aside from their other responsibilities and arrange for administration of a belated test . . . once appellant had refused to submit after fair warning of the consequences.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.