Skip to main content
· 3/31/1983

Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.

Citations

  • 666 P.2d 524
  • 136 Ariz. 424
  • 1983 Ariz. App. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing clarity afforded by absolute rule, but concluding that \it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results\
  • recognizing clarity afforded by absolute rule, but concluding that \it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results\
  • recognizing clarity afforded by absolute rule, but concluding that “it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results”
  • allowing recantation if made in sufficient time to obtain a blood or breath sample within two hours of the person's driving
  • subsequent consent honored if defendant still in custody, no substantial inconvenience for police, testing equipment still available, and test results still accurate
  • subsequent consent honored if defendant still in custody, no substantial inconvenience for police, testing equipment still available, and test results still accurate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyerson, Haire, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.