· 3/31/1983
Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.
Citations
- 666 P.2d 524
- 136 Ariz. 424
- 1983 Ariz. App. LEXIS 469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing clarity afforded by absolute rule, but concluding that \it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results\
- recognizing clarity afforded by absolute rule, but concluding that \it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results\
- recognizing clarity afforded by absolute rule, but concluding that “it could lead to unnecessarily harsh and self-defeating results”
- allowing recantation if made in sufficient time to obtain a blood or breath sample within two hours of the person's driving
- subsequent consent honored if defendant still in custody, no substantial inconvenience for police, testing equipment still available, and test results still accurate
- subsequent consent honored if defendant still in custody, no substantial inconvenience for police, testing equipment still available, and test results still accurate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyerson, Haire, Eubank
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.