Skip to main content
· 2/3/1977

Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev.

Citations

  • 560 P.2d 847
  • 39 Colo. App. 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusal may be changed into consent unless the delay will materially affect the results of the test
  • unless delay would materially affect test results, a subsequent consent may cure a prior refusal
  • subsequent consent valid if officer still available and delay does not materially affect test results
  • subsequent consent valid if officer still available and delay does not materially affect test results
  • unless delay would materially affect test results, a subsequent consent may cure a prior refusal
  • case remanded to determine whether twenty-five minute delay would materially affect result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.