Skip to main content
· 10/2/1997

State v. Rydeski

Citations

  • 571 N.W.2d 417
  • 214 Wis. 2d 101
  • 1997 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] verbal refusal is not required. The conduct of the accused may serve as the basis for a refusal.\
  • defendant's conduct can constitute refusal to take breathalyzer test even when no verbal refusal given
  • driver's conduct in insisting on using the restroom after agreeing to take the test in order to stall qualified as a \refusal\
  • driver's conduct in insisting on using the restroom after agreeing to take the test in order to stall qualified as a \refusal\
  • driver's stalling conduct qualified as refusal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dykman, Vergeront, Roggensack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.