Skip to main content

State v. Carrillo

Citations

  • 804 P.2d 1161
  • 311 Or. 61
  • 1991 Ore. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • detailing amendments to ORS 138.060 from 1963 to 1989 that broadened state’s right to appeal
  • if this court’s statutory interpretation is not viewed as correct, the legislature may easily amend the statute
  • if this court's statutory interpretation is not viewed as correct, the legislature may easily amend the statute
  • state may not appeal a judgment of acquittal because ORS 138.060 does not provide authority for such an appeal
  • the term “judgment order” is inherently contradictory
  • the term \judgment order\ is inherently contradictory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.