State v. Merrill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• substantial quantity and commercial drug offense are “alternative grounds for enhancing [a] sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-24· cited 18×
• State v. Flores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-30· cited 17×
• State v. Bourget-Goddard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-29· cited 12×
• State v. Cam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-06· cited 11×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-17· cited 8×
• State v. Unger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-10· cited 8×
• State v. Casavan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-03-13· cited 7×
• State v. Chilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-02· cited 7×
• State v. Villagomez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 5×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-01· cited 3×
• State v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-03
• State v. Mihm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moeller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-06· cited 84×
• State v. Moeller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-08-29· cited 81×
• State v. Ferrell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 32×
• State v. Stewart/Billings
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-21· cited 29×
• State v. Stewart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-15· cited 22×
• State v. Vasquez-Rubio
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-06-07· cited 12×
• State v. Stewart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-23· cited 12×
• State v. Drake
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-05-13· cited 10×
• State v. Wadekamper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-27· cited 6×