City of Portland v. Dollarhide

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ORS 161.035(2), which defines the scope and application of the Oregon Criminal Code, was not “intended to apply to offenses defined by cities”
• trial court erred in dismissing complaint after finding penalty provision invalid, because invalid penalty provision was severable and, upon conviction, defendant could be sentenced to penalty provided in general penalty provision
• city prostitution ordinances upheld after court severed invalid penalty provision
• city prostitution ordinances upheld after court severed invalid penalty provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).