Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/10/1995

State v. Boyd

Citations

257 Kan. 82
891 P.2d 358
1995 Kan. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding defendant waived issue for appeal regarding trial court's responses to jury's requests for further information where defendant failed to voice any objections or suggest a different response
presence of defendant will not be presumed where record is silent; defendant did not waive challenge to answer to jury’s request
timely objection necessaiy to give the trial court an opportunity to correct alleged trial errors
timely objection necessary to give the trial court an opportunity to correct alleged trial errors
the defendant’s failure to object to the read-back of testimony precludes any review of the read-back issue on appeal
argument on prejudicial effect does not erase need for contemporaneous objection; trial judge in better position than appellate court to evaluate probative value versus prejudicial effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Allegrucci, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.