Pankratz Implement Co. v. Citizens National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• spelling of debtor's name as \Roger House” rather than legal name \Rodger House” rendered financing statement ineffective
• finding a financing statement seriously misleading where the official search conducted by the Kansas secretary of state under the proper name did not reveal the financing statement
• courts should construe various provisions of an act in pari materia with view to reconcile and bring them into workable harmony
• “[T]he primary purpose of the revision of the name requirement is to lessen the amount of fact-intensive, case-by-case determinations that plagued earlier versions of the UCC, and to simplify the filing system as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).