Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/26/1984

State v. Freeman

Citations

689 P.2d 885
236 Kan. 274
1984 Kan. LEXIS 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that provisions contained in K.S.A. 21-3107 were enacted in order to implement and define the constitutional guarantees of the Double Jeopardy Clause
noting that 21-3107 ‘formulates the limitations upon unfair multiplicity of convictions or prosecutions’
noting that 21-3107 “formulates the limitations upon unfair multiplicity of convictions or prosecutions”
noting that 21-3107 \formulates the limitations upon unfair multiplicity of convictions or prosecutions\
The State could continue prosecution when the defendant “attempted to do the same thing as Johnson did in Ohio, to use the double jeopardy clause to prevent the State from completing its prosecution on the greater charges.”
conviction not appealable until defendant is sentenced or sentence is suspended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Prager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.