Supreme Court of Missouri· 4/12/2011

State v. Winfrey

Citations

337 S.W.3d 1
2011 Mo. LEXIS 117
2011 WL 1402775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a party seeking to compel arbitration under section 171.021(a) “must first establish the existence of a valid arbitration agreement”
when evidence is composed of a mix of hearsay and non-hearsay, the objecting party must specifically point out the statements which are inadmissible hearsay in order to preserve error
use of collateral matters offered only to impeach witness’s veracity is subject to the trial court’s discretion in limiting or excluding such evidence when its probative value is outweighed by its prejudicial effect
“However, if an out-of-court statement is not admitted to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but for some other purpose that is independently relevant without reference to the truthfulness of the statement, then the statement is non-hearsay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia Breckenridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.