State v. Meza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a restitutionary monetary sanction against the State was appropriate in order \to alleviate the cost of the extraordinary discovery burden that the State has forced the defense to undergo\
• “The proper vehicle to challenge the denial of a motion to dismiss is not an appeal but a petition for special action.”
• a law enforcement agency acting in this capacity “operates as an arm of the prosecutor” for the purposes of Rule 15.1
• “The denial of a motion to dismiss is not an appealable order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bohsancurt v. Eisenberg
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28· cited 43×
• State v. Booker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-18· cited 27×
• State of Arizona v. Douglas Lee Eddington
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 19×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16· cited 16×
• State of Arizona v. Derek Jesus Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-04-21· cited 15×
• Kaufmann v. Cruikshank
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-09-17· cited 5×
• Canion v. Cole Ex Rel. County of Maricopa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-06-08· cited 1×
• State v. GONZALES-PEREZ
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-01-30· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Janice L. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16
• Bohsancurt v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28
• John D. Kaufmann v. State of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-09-17
• State v. Brito, 01-2515 (2003)
  Superior Court of Rhode Island· 2003-11-05
• Bracamontes v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-11-15
• Lopez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-11-18

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society
  Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
• State v. Fisher
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 190×
• Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David Kreyling
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-21· cited 173×
• In re Brown
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-04-02· cited 132×
• Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health Services
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-03-13· cited 101×
• Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 57×
• Nathaniel B. Wright, III v. Delbert C. Jackson
  Fourth Circuit· 1975-08-14· cited 56×
• State v. Blenden
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 49×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-03· cited 44×
• State v. Stradley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-21· cited 35×
• Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-12-08· cited 34×
• Brown v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-01-09· cited 32×
• State v. Delgado
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-09· cited 27×
• State v. Jorgenson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 27×
• Steinfeld v. Zeckendorf
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1914-02-28· cited 20×
• Riley v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-26· cited 18×
• Nesmith v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-04-19· cited 18×
• State v. Thompson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-12-28· cited 14×
• Carpenter v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-29· cited 13×