Arizona Supreme Court· 1/9/1978
Brown v. State
Citations
- 573 P.2d 876
- 117 Ariz. 476
- 1978 Ariz. LEXIS 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although pro per petitioner not entitled to relief under writ of habeas corpus, court treated petition as petition for special action
- court may grant relief by special action even though motion or writ is inappropriately titled
- DOC must comply with APA and file its rales involving good-time credits with secretary of state
- where relief may be granted by extraordinary writ a court may grant appropriate relief even though the writ applied for or the motion made is not aptly titled
- treating habeas corpus petition as one for special action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marcus T. Baumann v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1985-02-28· cited 197×
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1992-11-09· cited 72×
- Findlay v. LewisArizona Supreme Court· 1992-09-15· cited 34×
- Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-01· cited 30×
- State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-08-15· cited 24×
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-02-27· cited 17×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16· cited 16×
- Salstrom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-01-30· cited 15×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-30· cited 15×
- KOOL RADIATORS, INC. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-05-31· cited 14×
- AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-03-31· cited 7×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-24· cited 6×
- White v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-09-27· cited 5×
- State of Arizona v. Patrick James SorianoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-30· cited 5×
- City of South Tucson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-04-14· cited 5×
- Malumphy v. MacDougallArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 4×
- Peru v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-07· cited 3×
- Bustamonte v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-29· cited 3×
- Wilkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-23· cited 2×
- David Fierro v. Ellis C. MacDougalNinth Circuit· 1982-12-15· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,017×
- James E. Sweet v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Director William D. LeekeFourth Circuit· 1975-12-01· cited 192×
- Goodman v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-10· cited 31×
- Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-15· cited 15×
- Hogan v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court· 1972-10-06· cited 7×
- Whitt v. State, Department of CorrectionsArizona Supreme Court· 1972-06-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.