Arizona Supreme Court· 2/28/1914
Steinfeld v. Zeckendorf
Citations
- 15 Ariz. 335
- 138 P. 1044
- 1914 Ariz. LEXIS 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As we understand it, the general rule, both at law and in equity, is that the owner is entitled to the return of his property or its value at the time of its wrongful conversion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court· 1989-03-13· cited 101×
- Maxima Corp. v. 6933 Arlington Development Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-03· cited 50×
- Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-03-09· cited 29×
- Kerr v. KillianCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-04-13· cited 25×
- State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-08-15· cited 24×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OldlandTenth Circuit· 1951-04-05· cited 23×
- Matter of Estate of BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-05-19· cited 13×
- Roe v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-06-24· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-10-26· cited 10×
- Standard Accident Insurance v. AllenArizona Supreme Court· 1931-04-27· cited 9×
- Magida v. Continental Can CompanyS.D. New York· 1956-09-06· cited 6×
- Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-05-19· cited 3×
- Kerr v. KillianArizona Tax Court· 1998-03-03· cited 2×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 544×
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 181×
- Moran v. SturgesSupreme Court· 1894-05-26· cited 177×
- In Re PottsSupreme Court· 1897-03-15· cited 147×
- Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court· 1893-03-20· cited 107×
- Stewart v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1894-05-14· cited 75×
- Cooper v. HillEighth Circuit· 1899-05-09· cited 70×
- Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. BradburySupreme Court· 1889-12-23· cited 62×
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 62×
- Tyler v. MagwireSupreme Court· 1873-03-17· cited 53×
- Gildersleeve v. New Mexico Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1896-03-16· cited 32×
- Haley v. KilpatrickEighth Circuit· 1900-10-24· cited 25×
- Zeckendorf v. SteinfeldSupreme Court· 1912-06-07· cited 22×
- Phelan v. City & County of San FrancisoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 22×
- Brown v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado· 1911-01-03· cited 15×
- Zeckendorf v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1887-12-12· cited 14×
- Mathews v. Columbia Nat. Bank of TacomaNinth Circuit· 1900-02-05· cited 12×
- Eagle Mining & Improvement Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court· 1910-11-28· cited 8×
- Steinfeld v. ZeckendorfArizona Supreme Court· 1906-05-12· cited 8×
- Steinfeld v. ZeckendorfArizona Supreme Court· 1907-03-23· cited 7×
Other cases named Steinfeld v. Zeckendorf
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.