Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/9/1993
State v. Delgado
Citations
- 848 P.2d 337
- 174 Ariz. 252
- 132 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The trial court has considerable discretion in resolving motions to amend an indictment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Claborne, Grant, Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ValenciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-05-02· cited 165×
- State v. Israel Joseph NaranjoArizona Supreme Court· 2014-03-18· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. ReynoldsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-04-15· cited 36×
- United States v. Gomez-HernandezNinth Circuit· 2012-05-31· cited 34×
- State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-08-15· cited 24×
- State v. KilleanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-21· cited 6×
- State v. OleaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-02-02· cited 2×
- State v. FreeneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-06-01· cited 1×
- State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-03-20· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Javier FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-07
- ROBBINS v. STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-12-31
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 212×
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 190×
- State v. SchrockArizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-31· cited 136×
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-28· cited 125×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-26· cited 93×
- State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 91×
- State v. DumaineArizona Supreme Court· 1989-11-07· cited 81×
- State v. OliverArizona Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 79×
- Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 76×
- Fisher v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 63×
- State v. TuckerArizona Supreme Court· 1988-06-02· cited 57×
- State v. FletcherArizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-28· cited 54×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-03· cited 44×
- State v. AnayaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-06-28· cited 32×
- State v. FullerArizona Supreme Court· 1985-02-08· cited 30×
- State v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-22· cited 26×
- State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-09-21· cited 25×
- State v. SammonsArizona Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.