Skip to main content
· 5/20/1977

Riley v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Citations

  • 567 P.2d 1218
  • 116 Ariz. 89
  • 1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating plaintiffs failed, in part, to exercise reasonable diligence because they made only one attempt to serve defendants, who had moved to China, while they were in the United States
  • stating plaintiffs failed, in part, to exercise reasonable diligence because they made only one attempt to serve defendants, who had moved to China, while they were in the United States
  • no good cause despite defendants having been aware of potential lawsuit and plaintiffs having made unsuccessful attempts to serve defendants, who resided in China

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Richmond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.