· 5/20/1977
Riley v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
Citations
- 567 P.2d 1218
- 116 Ariz. 89
- 1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating plaintiffs failed, in part, to exercise reasonable diligence because they made only one attempt to serve defendants, who had moved to China, while they were in the United States
- stating plaintiffs failed, in part, to exercise reasonable diligence because they made only one attempt to serve defendants, who had moved to China, while they were in the United States
- no good cause despite defendants having been aware of potential lawsuit and plaintiffs having made unsuccessful attempts to serve defendants, who resided in China
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Richmond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.