Utah Supreme Court· 4/23/1987

State v. Medina

Citations

738 P.2d 1021
56 Utah Adv. Rep. 17
1987 Utah LEXIS 838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing challenge to an Allen instruction only under ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel affirmatively stated at trial that she had no objection to the instruction
court refused to consider manifest injustice exception where defense counsel stated she had no objection to the instruction
manifest error and ineffective assistance claims asserted to avoid effect of failure to object
manifest error and ineffective assistance claims asserted to avoid effect of failure to object
\[Tlhe fact remains that counsel consciously chose not to assert any objection that might have been raised and affirmatively led the trial court to believe that there was nothing wrong with the instruction.\
\[Tihe fact remains that counsel consciously chose not to assert any objection that might have been raised and affirmatively led the trial court to believe that there was nothing wrong with the instruction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.