Utah Supreme Court· 11/30/1992
State v. Brown
Citations
- 853 P.2d 851
- 201 Utah Adv. Rep. 4
- 1992 Utah LEXIS 99
- 1992 WL 355069
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying bifurcated standard to consent, plain view, exigent circumstance, and incident-to-arrest exceptions to warrant requirement
- rejecting a sufficiency of the evidence challenge to an aggravated assault charge where defendant threatened, but did not harm, victim with a wrench
- holding part-time prosecutor barred from acting as defense counsel
- explaining why court will not address argument raised for first time in reply brief
- applying plain error standard requiring an obvious error affecting substantial rights of accused
- construing Breckenridge as presenting \clear plain error and obvious constitutional ramifications\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Stewart, Hall, Howe, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court· 1994-02-15· cited 508×
- State v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court· 2003-09-08· cited 329×
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court· 2017-11-14· cited 251×
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court· 2000-09-29· cited 207×
- Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court· 1994-01-11· cited 104×
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court· 1994-08-18· cited 87×
- Brown v. GloverUtah Supreme Court· 2000-11-14· cited 80×
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court· 1996-02-02· cited 63×
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court· 2001-10-19· cited 62×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1993-05-12· cited 48×
- State v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court· 2010-09-28· cited 47×
- State v. SmithUtah Supreme Court· 1995-12-20· cited 45×
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2013-05-23· cited 45×
- State v. ArguellesUtah Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 44×
- State v. MetUtah Supreme Court· 2016-11-21· cited 42×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-09-11· cited 37×
- State v. MabeUtah Supreme Court· 1993-11-23· cited 37×
- Loving v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-05-22· cited 37×
- State v. KingUtah Supreme Court· 2008-08-05· cited 35×
- Hart v. Salt Lake County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-08-28· cited 34×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 659×
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court· 1982-01-13· cited 382×
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 250×
- The People v. StovalIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-05-29· cited 250×
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-11· cited 244×
- In re SkolnickSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 237×
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court· 1989-02-01· cited 147×
- Ronald Watson Lafferty v. Gerald Cook, Warden of the Utah State PrisonTenth Circuit· 1992-01-03· cited 137×
- People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-01-20· cited 126×
- People v. ShinkleNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-12-18· cited 122×
- United States v. RagenSupreme Court· 1942-02-02· cited 110×
- State v. BookerUtah Supreme Court· 1985-10-25· cited 99×
- State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 90×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.