Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 10/18/1989

State v. Bullock

Citations

  • 791 P.2d 155
  • 119 Utah Adv. Rep. 33
  • 1989 Utah LEXIS 131
  • 1989 WL 201073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding trial counsel's decision not to object to unfavorable testimony did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
  • noting that sound trial strategy may involve failing to object to testimony as to witness's belief of victim's allegations where belief is used to attack the \motives and methods\ of the witness
  • holding strategic decision by counsel to allow evidence precludes plain error analysis
  • stating that plain error rule, while existing to protect defendants from less-than-perfect counsel, “is in no way implicated if defense counsel consciously elects to permit evidence to be admitted as part of a defense strategy rather than through inadvertence or neglect”
  • considering the actions of defense counsel to determine whether counsel's failure to object was part of the trial strategy
  • considering the actions of defense counsel to determine whether counsel's failure to object was part of the trial strategy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Zimmerman, Billings, Howe, Stewart, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.