Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 10/29/1996

State v. Crosby

Citations

  • 927 P.2d 638
  • 302 Utah Adv. Rep. 36
  • 1996 Utah LEXIS 93
  • 1996 WL 625298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that in other jurisdictions polygraph evidence either is inadmissible per se or requires a stipulation
  • noting that in other jurisdictions polygraph evidence either is inadmissible per se or requires a stipulation
  • stating that Rimmasch sets forth the proper standard for admitting scientific evidence under rule 702
  • stating that Rimmasch sets forth the proper standard for admitting scientific evidence under rule 702
  • ‚*W+e give trial counsel wide latitude in making tactical decisions and will not question such decisions unless there is no reasonable basis supporting them.‛
  • applying the single larceny rule to theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson, Durham, Durham's, Howe, Rus-Son, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.