Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/25/2012
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 813 N.W.2d 1
- 2012 WL 204520
- 2012 Minn. LEXIS 3
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, in Bartylla, the court interpreted the Minnesota Constitution coextensively with the Fourth Amendment
- stating that “[e]stablished exceptions to the warrant requirement include . . . searches conducted after obtaining voluntary consent”
- observing that whether a search is constitutionally reasonable generally depends on whether the government complies with the warrant clause “by obtaining a warrant from a neutral magistrate based upon probable cause”
- “We presume Minnesota statutes are constitutional and will strike down a statute as unconstitutional only if absolutely necessary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Dietzen, Meyer, Paul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon IIISupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-04-19· cited 132×
- Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-07-14· cited 50×
- State v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-31· cited 43×
- State of Minnesota v. David Ray BennettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-07-27· cited 16×
- In re the Welfare of M.L.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-01-25· cited 10×
- State v. MedinaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-07-11· cited 9×
- State v. HollowaySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-08-01· cited 6×
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Allan Carbo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-05-08· cited 5×
- State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann MungerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-01-12· cited 4×
- Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-07-25· cited 4×
- In re Guardianship of DurandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-03-03· cited 1×
- Otto v. Wright Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-04-18· cited 1×
- Fosle v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-12-05
- State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi PlancarteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-02-05
- A23-1099 Rashad Ramon Ivy v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-10
- State of Minnesota, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock, Respondent/Cross-AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-12-03
- State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-SanchezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2026-04-15
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,649×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.