Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 813 N.W.2d 1
  • 2012 WL 204520
  • 2012 Minn. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in Bartylla, the court interpreted the Minnesota Constitution coextensively with the Fourth Amendment
  • stating that “[e]stablished exceptions to the warrant requirement include . . . searches conducted after obtaining voluntary consent”
  • observing that whether a search is constitutionally reasonable generally depends on whether the government complies with the warrant clause “by obtaining a warrant from a neutral magistrate based upon probable cause”
  • “We presume Minnesota statutes are constitutional and will strike down a statute as unconstitutional only if absolutely necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Dietzen, Meyer, Paul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.