Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/26/2000

Edmond v. State

Citations

534 S.E.2d 682
341 S.C. 340
2000 S.C. LEXIS 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining the same harmless error factors considered in a direct appeal should be considered in determining prejudice in a PCR case when the State has commented on a defendant's constitutional right
stating factors to consider include whether the offensive comment was a single reference, whether the State tied the defendant's silence directly to his exculpatory story, whether the exculpatory story was totally implausible, and whether the evidence of guilt was overwhelming

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.