Washington Supreme Court· 12/9/1993
State v. McGee
Citations
- 864 P.2d 912
- 122 Wash. 2d 783
- 1993 Wash. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute does not require the state to prove that the intended delivery site was within 1,000 feet of a school
- a statute is ambiguous when it is subject to two or more reasonable interpretations
- rejecting as unreasonable interpretation rendering statute's language superfluous
- rejecting as unreasonable interpretation rendering statute’s language superfluous
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BrettWashington Supreme Court· 1995-04-04· cited 373×
- State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court· 2003-02-20· cited 259×
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 208×
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 197×
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 167×
- In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 166×
- State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 160×
- > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 116×
- State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 103×
- State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 102×
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
- State v. Silva-BaltazarWashington Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 71×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of SietzWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 56×
- In Re BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 48×
- In re the Personal Restraint of BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 48×
- State v. RadanWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-22· cited 38×
- In re the Personal Restraint of SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-14· cited 36×
- In Re SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-14· cited 35×
- City of Seattle v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-11· cited 32×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BassSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 1,739×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,362×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 843×
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 742×
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 734×
- Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 584×
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court· 1805-02-21· cited 544×
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-03-26· cited 422×
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 296×
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-10-01· cited 260×
- In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court· 1993-07-08· cited 222×
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 123×
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court· 1992-03-05· cited 123×
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 1990-04-26· cited 122×
- United States v. George Vernon HansenD.C. Circuit· 1985-08-30· cited 121×
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 91×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 89×
- United States v. Warren Eugene WakeFifth Circuit· 1991-12-10· cited 85×
- In Re EatonWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-07· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.