In Re Eaton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here a statute designates a list of things whereupon the statute operates, the inference arises that the Legislature intended to omit other things not listed[.]”
• “where a statute designates a list of things whereupon the statute operates, the inference arises that the Legislature intended to omit other things not listed; ‘specific inclusions exclude implication’ ”
• remanding case to determine whether parking fines were constitutionally excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).