Washington Supreme Court· 5/28/1998
State v. Lewis
Citations
- 135 Wash. 2d 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the application of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), including its sentencing provisions, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo
- holding that former RCW 9.94A.310(3)(e) was ambiguous as to whether firearm sentencing enhancements ran consecutively to one another in addition to running consecutively to the sentences for the underlying crimes
- stating that \the rule only applies when a penal statute is ambiguous and legislative intent is insufficient to clarify the ambiguity\
- Under former RCW 9.94A.310(3)(e) and former RCW 9.94A.400(1)(a), firearm enhancements in nonexceptional sentences must run concurrently.
- “When construing a statute, we read it in its entirety and interpret the various provisions in light of one another.”
- Under former RCW 9.94A.310(3)(e) and former RCW 9.94A.400(1)(a), firearm enhancements in nonexceptional sentences must run concurrently.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 443×
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-07-07· cited 385×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 197×
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-03-22· cited 194×
- State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 186×
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court· 2013-04-11· cited 182×
- In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 166×
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court· 2010-02-18· cited 153×
- State v. NitschCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-24· cited 124×
- State v. KorumWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-17· cited 120×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 102×
- State v. JordenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-03· cited 96×
- State v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court· 2000-07-13· cited 83×
- State v. ConoverWashington Supreme Court· 2015-08-13· cited 75×
- In re the Personal Restraint of GreeningWashington Supreme Court· 2000-09-21· cited 74×
- In re the Personal Restraint of CallWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-26· cited 65×
- State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court· 2003-05-15· cited 59×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1999-05-06· cited 58×
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-11-03· cited 57×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 742×
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court· 1995-06-05· cited 697×
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-08· cited 352×
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-21· cited 290×
- State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 166×
- Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 155×
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 149×
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court· 1992-03-05· cited 123×
- State v. BatistaWashington Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 94×
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court· 1993-12-09· cited 93×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 89×
- State v. Ha'mimWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 86×
- Senate Republican Campaign Committee v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 62×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of SietzWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 56×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of VandervlugtWashington Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 54×
- State v. CarterWashington Supreme Court· 1977-11-03· cited 53×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LongWashington Supreme Court· 1991-09-05· cited 23×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-06-13· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.