Skip to main content

State v. Lewis

Citations

  • 135 Wash. 2d 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the application of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), including its sentencing provisions, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo
  • holding that former RCW 9.94A.310(3)(e) was ambiguous as to whether firearm sentencing enhancements ran consecutively to one another in addition to running consecutively to the sentences for the underlying crimes
  • stating that \the rule only applies when a penal statute is ambiguous and legislative intent is insufficient to clarify the ambiguity\
  • Under former RCW 9.94A.310(3)(e) and former RCW 9.94A.400(1)(a), firearm enhancements in nonexceptional sentences must run concurrently.
  • “When construing a statute, we read it in its entirety and interpret the various provisions in light of one another.”
  • Under former RCW 9.94A.310(3)(e) and former RCW 9.94A.400(1)(a), firearm enhancements in nonexceptional sentences must run concurrently.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.