City of Seattle v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the question of whether the order was still in effect at the lime of the alleged violation made the order invalid
• RCW 26.50.060 authorizes the issuance of permanent orders and does not require any particular wording.
• RCW 26.50.060 “authorizes the issuance of permanent orders and does not require any particular wording.”
• facts unclear as to protection order's effective dates; State must prove the validity of the underlying order as an implicit element of the crime of violating a protection order
• facts unclear as to protection order’s effective dates; State must prove the validity of the underlying order as an implicit element of the crime of violating a protection order
• discussing protective order issued pursuant to RCW 26.50.060(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).