Skip to main content

State v. Mays

Citations

  • 269 Or. App. 599
  • 346 P.3d 535
  • 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an appellate court will usually defer to demeanor-based credibility findings
  • explaining that we generally review motions to dismiss for errors of law
  • “In sum, * * * in determining whether the state and federal constitutional [former and] double jeopardy provisions preclude a retrial, the dispositive issue is whether the prosecutor had the requisite scienter” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Haselton, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.