Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 9/17/2010

United States v. Bohn

Citations

  • 622 F.3d 1129
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19384
  • 2010 WL 3607132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Fifth Amendment does not prohibit compelled disclosure of individual’s name absent reasonable belief that disclosure would tend to incriminate him
  • “A criminal defendant’s constitutional rights may be violated when witnesses are made unavailable through the suggestion, procurement, or negligence of the government.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • a defendant’s disclosure of name and identification has no incriminating effect where police officer knows who defendant is and what he has done, such as where a traffic violation occurs in the officer’s presence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Paez, Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.