Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/31/2010
State v. Garner
Citations
- 228 P.3d 710
- 234 Or. App. 486
- 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing prejudicial effect of prosecutors’ comment in opening argument that the defendant refused to perform FSTs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-09-30· cited 23×
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 15×
- State v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 10×
- State v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 8×
- State v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 7×
- State v. McCraryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.