Supreme Court of Iowa· 1/4/2008

State v. Maxwell

Citations

743 N.W.2d 185
2008 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 2
2008 WL 53709

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing the record to determine whether a basis for affirming denial of the motion existed when the district court gave no reasons for denying the new-trial motion
requiring court to “determine whether all of the facts and circumstances create a reasonable inference that the person knew of the presence of the controlled substance and had control and dominion over it”
“[I]f the claim lacks the necessary prejudice, we can decide the case on the prejudice prong of the test without deciding whether the attorney performed deficiently.”
“We consider a sentence void if a statute does not authorize it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

347 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Maxwell

121 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.