State v. Meek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the text of a statute must be considered in the totality of the statutory framework
• when the legislature uses different terms within the same statute, it intends different meanings for those terms
• “Text, however, can- not be viewed in isolation, but must, instead, be considered in the totality of the statutory framework.”
• “Text, however, cannot be viewed in isolation, but must, instead, be consid- ered in the totality of the statutory framework.”
• when the legislature uses different terms within the same statute, it intends different meanings for those terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-31· cited 8×
• Timmermann v. Herman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-02· cited 5×
• A. A. C. v. Miller-Pomlee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-03· cited 5×
• De Young v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-05-01· cited 4×
• Kinzua Res., LLC v. Or. Dep't of Envtl. Quality
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-12· cited 3×
• State v. Bales
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 2×
• State v. Nebreja
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-16· cited 1×
• Wright v. PERS
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-11-08
• McCoy v. McCoy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-13

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Robertson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-08-03· cited 334×
• State v. Rangel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-26· cited 185×
• State v. Stamper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-09· cited 105×
• State v. Stamper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-23· cited 61×
• Crystal Communications, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-03-07· cited 44×
• State v. Maxwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 26×
• Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources Department
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11· cited 23×
• State v. Newell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 19×
• State v. Buchalski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 2×
• State v. Buchalski
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 1×