Skip to main content

State v. Brooks

Citations

  • 604 N.W.2d 345
  • 2000 WL 21365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that constitution prohibited a cash-only bail because the constitution contained the phrase \bail by sufficient sureties\
  • holding that an all-cash bail violates Minnesota’s sufficient sureties clause
  • holding that an all-cash bail violates Minnesota's sufficient sureties clause
  • noting that future defendants might have “no remedy” if the case were not decided because “[m]ost pretrial bail issues are, by definition, short-lived”
  • noting \cash only bail orders can be used to deny bail to those accused who have other means of providing sufficient surety\
  • noting that over two-thirds of state constitutions contain the equivalent provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul H. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.