Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/15/2000
State v. Brooks
Citations
- 604 N.W.2d 345
- 2000 WL 21365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that constitution prohibited a cash-only bail because the constitution contained the phrase \bail by sufficient sureties\
- holding that an all-cash bail violates Minnesota’s sufficient sureties clause
- holding that an all-cash bail violates Minnesota's sufficient sureties clause
- noting that future defendants might have “no remedy” if the case were not decided because “[m]ost pretrial bail issues are, by definition, short-lived”
- noting \cash only bail orders can be used to deny bail to those accused who have other means of providing sufficient surety\
- noting that over two-thirds of state constitutions contain the equivalent provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul H. Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-05-07· cited 135×
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-05-10· cited 114×
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-11· cited 94×
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-03-18· cited 84×
- Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court· 2005-10-12· cited 70×
- Jasper v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-04-18· cited 57×
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2003-07-16· cited 45×
- Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-07-25· cited 30×
- Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-07-15· cited 29×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-12· cited 26×
- Ethan Dean v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-05· cited 26×
- Schowalter v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-10-31· cited 24×
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-05-16· cited 20×
- State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-09-08· cited 18×
- Saunders v. HorneckerWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-03-05· cited 18×
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-09-17· cited 17×
- City of Golden Valley v. WiebesickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-07-19· cited 16×
- State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court· 2014-07-31· cited 14×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-10-30· cited 13×
- Fullerton v. County CourtColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-05-05· cited 12×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 1,157×
- Matter of BlilieSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-01-22· cited 84×
- Ex Parte George MilburnSupreme Court· 1835-03-14· cited 62×
- State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 56×
- Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-07-28· cited 56×
- In re ShetskySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-06-19· cited 49×
- Wynkoop v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-22· cited 45×
- State ex rel. Jones v. HendonOhio Supreme Court· 1993-04-14· cited 40×
- State v. PettSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-09-16· cited 34×
- State v. GoldenLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-06-06· cited 14×
- State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1963-06-28· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. CayeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 13×
- State Ex Rel. Lezer v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1964-05-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.