Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 8/22/1990

State v. Matthews

Citations

805 S.W.2d 776
1990 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that testimony concerning the amount and the street value of the drugs was admissible to prove the defendant’s intent
holding that this court could not consider a transcript attached to the appellant’s brief because it was not made a part of the record
concluding that testimony concerning the amount and the street value of the drugs was admissible to prove the defendant’s intent
holding that transcripts attached to the appellant’s brief were not considered by this Court because they were not made part of the record
holding that this court could not consider a transcript attached to the appellant’s brief because it was not made a part of the record
concluding that a transcript attached to the appellant‟s brief could not be considered because it was not made a part of the appellate record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Birch, Cornelius

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,903 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Matthews

343 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.