Skip to main content
· 12/13/2023

State of Minnesota v. Christian Portillo, A21-1621, Supreme Court, December 13, 2023

Syllabus

The State committed a plain error that affected the appellant's substantial rights when the prosecutor misstated the law during the closing-argument rebuttal, and to ensure the fairness and integrity of judicial proceedings the plain error must be addressed. Reversed and remanded.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that jury should have been instructed that it should convict only if the images depicted \conduct that connotes sex acts involving a minor….\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.