Washington Supreme Court· 1/5/1984

State v. Marino

Citations

674 P.2d 171
100 Wash. 2d 719
1984 Wash. LEXIS 1442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, in order to terminate pretrial diversion, the trial court must make a finding that termination is reasonable and clearly state the evidence upon which the court relied
where factual disputes are resolved and trial court's decision is based on the evidence, due process is satisfied
`\The venue must be proved by the plaintiff but it need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt; it is sufficient if venue can be reasonably inferred from the facts and circumstances ....'\ (quoting 11 Washington Pattern Jury Instructions: Criminal 4.21 cmt.)
“ ‘The venue must be proved by the plaintiff but it need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt; it is sufficient if venue can be reasonably inferred from the facts and circumstances ....’” (quoting 11 Washington Pattern Jury Instructions: Criminal 4.21 cmt.)
“[A]ppellant is entitled to have factual disputes resolved by a neutral fact finder. This includes an independent determination that the deferred prosecution agreement was violated, by a preponderance of the evidence with the burden of proof on the State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dimmick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.