New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 12/15/1981
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 443 A.2d 252
- 183 N.J. Super. 86
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant is statutorily entitled to a “summary hearing” but that due process does not require a full evidentiary hearing in every case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MarinoWashington Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 42×
- State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court· 2007-10-22· cited 35×
- State v. HenselNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-04-14· cited 31×
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-04-28· cited 27×
- Colby Taylor Lee v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2018-10-11· cited 5×
- State v. FentonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-06-09· cited 3×
- State v. KlineNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-07-22
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-07-21· cited 125×
- State v. De BonisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-04-08· cited 82×
- State v. ZachowskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-01-13· cited 24×
- State v. PorroNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-08-01· cited 11×
- State v. DevattNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-04-01· cited 10×
- State v. LebbingNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-04-12· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.