State v. Hobbs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that despite defense’s opportunity to give additional closing argument, supplemental instructions were still not appropriate where defense was not able to rethink its cross-examination strategy based on original instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hickman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-04-30· cited 278×
• State v. Calvin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-28· cited 149×
• State v. Lee
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-09· cited 48×
• State v. Benitez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11· cited 26×
• State v. Hull
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-10-10· cited 19×
• State v. Hickman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-21· cited 4×
• State Of Washington v. Talyn K.j. Benitez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-06-11
• State Of Washington v. Donald Calvin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pelkey
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 158×
• State v. Marino
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 42×
• State v. Ransom
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-24· cited 33×
• State v. Worland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-06-30· cited 32×
• State v. McCorkell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-21· cited 25×
• State v. Hawthorne
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-01· cited 17×
• State v. Plano
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-11-02· cited 16×