State v. Jimenez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that PPD agreements are drafted to meet a state’s penal interests
• noting that alternatives to termination of the PPD program should be considered that would also meet the State’s penal interests
• observing that the different treatment of individuals based on ability to pay 9 restitution as a condition of probation invokes due process and equal protection 10 concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Davis
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-01-10· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bearden v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
• Black v. Romano
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 620×
• State v. Marino
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Melnyk
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-12· cited 17×
• State v. Devatt
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-04-01· cited 10×
• State v. Trammel
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-12-01· cited 10×
• State v. Bowie
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-06-14· cited 3×
• State v. Jimenez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-02-01· cited 2×