State v. Mecca Twin Theater & Film Exchange, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• omitted finding as to defendant’s ability to comply with court’s order could be gleaned from the record
• corporate officer had knowledge of court order where he was personally served with a copy thereof; contempt sanctions were affirmed
• corporate officer had knowledge of court order where he was personally served with a copy thereof; contempt sanctions were affirmed
• where essential facts were not in dispute, remand for findings would be a useless act
• a remand for findings is not needed if the facts are not disputed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).