Skip to main content

State v. Cassill-Skilton

Citations

  • 94 P.3d 407
  • 122 Wash. App. 652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although drug court statute contains no provisions for operating the program, the court can use chapter 10.05 RCW for guidance
  • although drug court statute contains no provisions for operating the program, court can use chapter 10.05 RCW for guidance
  • defendant discharged despite no notice of violations, no record of any hearing, and no record of any findings by trial court
  • Division Two finding that deferred prosecution statutes apply by analogy to drug court proceedings
  • “RCW 10.05.090 requires a court to conduct a hearing, after notice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridgewater

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Cassill-Skilton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.