Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 5/14/2003
State v. Dudley
Citations
- 581 S.E.2d 171
- 354 S.C. 514
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding extraterritorial jurisdiction was a component of subject matter jurisdiction
- listing authorities and concluding that extraterritorial application of criminal laws is an issue of subject matter jurisdiction
- discussing additional decisions recognizing the detrimental effects doctrine set forth in Strassheim independent of any legislation and going on to explain that the absence of such legislation is not dispositive
- discussing additional decisions recognizing the detrimental effects doctrine set forth in Strassheim independent of any legislation and going on to explain that the absence of such legislation is not dispositive
- \This failure to object resulting in waiver of personal jurisdiction applies equally in constructive contempt cases.\
- \A defendant may waive any complaints he may have regarding personal jurisdiction by failing to object to the lack of personal jurisdiction and by appearing to defend his case.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connor, Cureton, Huff, Howard, Shuler, Anderson, Goolsby, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28· cited 38×
- Ex Parte CannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-11-06· cited 26×
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-05-31· cited 23×
- State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-31· cited 17×
- Kountze v. KountzeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-12· cited 16×
- John Doe v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court· 2019-06-14· cited 13×
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-09-08· cited 7×
- State v. JackAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-12-12· cited 3×
- State of Arizona v. John William JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-05-28
- Wellin v. WellinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-01-04
- Petro Welt Trading ges.M.B.h v. Edward BrinkmannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-08
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court· 1892-12-12· cited 815×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court· 1911-05-15· cited 337×
- United States v. EvansTenth Circuit· 1992-06-30· cited 245×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-06· cited 90×
- State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-11-17· cited 87×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 78×
- State v. GunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-09-23· cited 77×
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-10· cited 75×
- State v. LeggTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-12-20· cited 64×
- Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-12-11· cited 62×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-07-06· cited 61×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-27· cited 60×
- Bakala v. BakalaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 59×
- People v. BlumeMichigan Supreme Court· 1993-08-31· cited 58×
- State v. PrimusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 56×
- State v. BuckmonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-13· cited 44×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.