Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/16/1990
State v. Riddle
Citations
- 391 S.E.2d 253
- 301 S.C. 211
- 1990 S.C. LEXIS 82
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- amendment to indictment to increase offense from 3rd degree CSC to 1st Degree CSC, and increase potential punishment from 10 to 30 years
- amendment to indictment to increase offense from 3rd degree CSC to 1st Degree CSC, and increase potential punishment from 10 to 30 years
- amendment of indictment from assault with intent to commit third degree CSC to assault with intent to commit first degree CSC deprived court of subject matter jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hope v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-13· cited 28×
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 23×
- State v. ErvinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-16· cited 22×
- State v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-10-28· cited 22×
- Dover v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-06· cited 18×
- Granger v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-10-26· cited 15×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-11-08· cited 14×
- Clair v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 10×
- Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-05-26· cited 6×
- State v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-12-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.