Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/10/2009

State v. Lucero

Citations

220 P.3d 249
223 Ariz. 129
571 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 770

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting a distinction between affirmative actions to “initiate the error” and merely acquiescing to the error
noting a distinction between affirmative actions to “initiate the error” and merely acquiescing to the error
“invited error [doctrine] precludes a party who causes or initiates an error from profiting from the error on appeal”
“expressly requesting the superior court not to give a lesser-included offense instruction amounts to invited error.”
“[I]nvited error precludes a party who causes or initiates an error from profiting from the error on appeal. If the error is invited, the offending party has no recourse on appeal even under the exacting standard of fundamental error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kessler, Hall, Orozco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.