State of Arizona v. Raul Herrera III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the court did not abuse its discretion in finding victim’s testimony “was sufficient to allow the jury to find [defendant] had committed the” other acts
• that jury did not find a defendant guilty of all charges suggests the verdict was not emotionally driven

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).