Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/28/2010

State v. Kinney

Citations

241 P.3d 914
225 Ariz. 550
594 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

preserving an argument for appellate review requires a party to make a sufficient argument to allow the trial court to rule on the issue
upholding investigatory detention based on totality of circumstances where defendant “somewhat matched” suspect’s physical description
“To preserve an argument for review, the defendant must make a sufficient argument to allow a trial court to rule on the issue.”
“To preserve an argument for review, the defendant must make a sufficient argument to allow a trial court to rule on the issue.”
absent other reasons, \police officers may only detain a person long enough to determine whether there is an outstanding warrant for the person's arrest\
court of appeals will address waived issue when upholding trial court’s ruling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Brammer, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.